Ülo Ennuste majandusartiklid

Kadi Mägi et al. täienduseks

 

Kadi Mägi et al. (2016)* teaduslikule segregatsiooni artiklile teaduslikuks täienduseks

  1. Thorsten ja Riera-Crichton (2014)** teaduspõhiselt väidavad et suure osakaaluga vähemusrahvusega riigis (nagu meil venekeelseid 1/3*) puhul – on majandus-šokkides (nagu parajasti meil kaasatuna EL28 multi dimensionaalsse (sh majanduse dimensioonides) sõtta Venemaaga ja parajasti ka meie rahvuslik majandus negatiivsel konvegentsi trendil EL28 kontekstis – vt Komisjoni Kevadprognoosi 2016) – on kodusõja puhkemise risk väga kõrge (seda eriti putinoidtrollide propaganda kaskaadide tingimustes). Järeldus: viivitamatult tuleb meil väärata sõnavabaduse valesti tõlgendamine nagu igaüks (ka kiskjalikud Kremlimeelsed) võivad siin vabalt oma valearvamusi/uskumusi levitada ning kodusõjavaenu õhutada
  2. Eurostati ühe 2016 publikatsiooni järgi*** üldiselt on ELi riikides (ka Eestis) võõrriikidest pärit residentide (meil eeskätt venekeelsete*) majandusaktiivsus sihtmadalam kui põliselanikel. Järelikult majandusstabiilsuse jätkusuutlikkuse huvides (ka piirkonniti) peab muulaste kontsentratsiooniga äärmiselt ettevaatlik olema: eriti arvestades et Mägi et al.* järgi näib et muulaste kontrentatsioonid meil järjest suurenevad ning Tallinnas v.k näib suuremates linnaosades peatselt hakkavat täies ulatuses domineerima – ning kahetsusväärselt näib et linnaisad ning ka mitmed riigiisad on ammu unustanud et nii EL28 peamine keel on ingl nagu ka teadusel üle maailma. Meenub et kui kunagi tsaariajal G. Suits tuli Helsingi Ülikoolist läbi Tallinna – siis olla öelnud et siin “rohkem sealauda moodi”.

 

 

*) Mägi, Kadi; Kadri Leetmaa, Tiit Tammaru, Maarten van Ham (2016) „Types of spatial mobility and change in people’s ethnic residential contexts“ – DEMOGRAPHIC RESEARCH VOLUME 34, ARTICLE 41, PAGES 1161−1192 PUBLISHED 28 JUNE 2016 http://www.demographic-research.org/Volumes/Vol34/41/ DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2016.34.41:

http://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol34/41/default.htm

BTW: this DP paper by Mägi et al. (2016) needs independent competent historical terrorist occupational/colonalizational experts corrections – first of all e.g. on the basis of collection:

White Book (2005): The White Book: Losses Inflicted on the Estonian Nation by Occupation Regimes 1940–1991”(2005) State Committee on the Investigation into Repression Policy of Occupation, Tallinn: Estonian Encyclopaedia Publishers: 171: http://www.digar.ee/arhiiv/nlib-digar:8192

The present content is in great amount politically biased and erreuneos – take for example excerpt from p 1162:

“Today, Russian speakers form almost one third of the 1.3 million people living in Estonia, giving Estonia one of the highest proportions of ethnic minorities in Europe. The Russian speaking minority population in Estonia has its roots in the intensive immigration that took place from other Soviet republics in the period when the country was part of the Soviet Union (1940–1991).“

A)“the country was part of the Soviet Union (1940-1991)“ – was under the predatory communist Russian occupation: WB pp 9-25.

B)“The Russian speaking minority population in Estonia has its roots in the intensive immigration that took place from other Soviet republics … “ – has its roots mainly and first of all in the intensive mass destruction of Estonian population by communist Kremlin genocides, war crimes and crimes against humanity: WB pp 25-47 –  ca 1/3 of initial 1040 population was lost (mainly elites) and these communist crimes are the main roots/factors/regressors of segregation – segregation that involves also anomalous emigration of nationals especially in the conditions of the previous Hybrid-War  with nuclear Russia.

C)“intensive immigration that took place“ – was mainly not free willing but deportation of Russian speakers by Kremlin even from the Gulag camps into our  suberbs etc for the total Russification of Estonian genuine population and destruction of Estonian national sustainability: BTW in Estonia immigrants are economically less effective then nationals:

http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/news/news-releases?p_p_id=101_INSTANCE_jtJORfNw4amk&p_p_lifecycle=0&p_p_state=normal&p_p_mode=view&p_p_col_id=column-2&p_p_col_count=1&_101_INSTANCE_jtJORfNw4amk_delta=20&_101_INSTANCE_jtJORfNw4amk_keywords=&_101_INSTANCE_jtJORfNw4amk_advancedSearch=false&_101_INSTANCE_jtJORfNw4amk_andOperator=true&p_r_p_564233524_resetCur=false&_101_INSTANCE_jtJORfNw4amk_cur=2

And so the “ethnic residential differentiation typically reflects the differences between the consumption capacity and preferences of the different ethnic groups as well as the discrimination practices in these societies (e.g., Massey and Denton 1985; Johnston, Forrest, and Poulsen 2002) …the ethnic residential differentiation typically reflects the differences between the consumption capacity and preferences of the different ethnic groups as well as the discrimination practices in these societies” – these kind of residential differentiation are in Estonia presently spontaneously widening (Eurostat: economic inequality is presently in Estonia growing) – with accommodating discrimination practices – especially fortified by Kremlin present military activities for restotration the Soviet Union.

 

 

**) Thorsten Janus, Daniel Riera-Crichton (2014) Economic shocks, civil war and ethnicity. – Journal of Development Economics 115 (2015) 32–44.

***) Eurostat (110/2016 – 6 June 2016) Migrant integration in the EU labour market in 2015.

juuli 13, 2016 - Posted by | Uncategorized

Kommentaare veel pole.

Lisa kommentaar

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Muuda )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Muuda )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Muuda )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Muuda )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: